Authentification abonné
lvrfg
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 41 / Numéro 253 (Novembre-Décembre 2015) Rev. Fr. Gest., 41 253 (2015) 387-413 Références
Accès gratuit
Numéro
Rev. Fr. Gest.
Volume 41, Numéro 253, Novembre-Décembre 2015
La Revue Française de Gestion : 40 Ans d'Influence
Page(s) 387 - 413
DOI https://doi.org/10.3166/RFG.180.131-157
Publié en ligne 18 avril 2016
  1. Abrams F.W. (1951). “Management Responsibilities in a Complex World”, Harvard Business Review, XXIX, 3 May. [Google Scholar]
  2. Abrahamson E. (1991). “Managerial fads and fashions: the diffusion and rejection of innovation”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 16, n° 3, p. 586–612. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ackerman R.W. (1973). “How companies respond to social demand”, Harvard Business Review, July-August, p. 88–98. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ackerman R.W. (1975). The Social Challenge to Busines, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England, Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ackerman R.W., Bauer R.A. (1976). Corporate Social Responsiveness - The Modern Dilemna, Reston Virginia. [Google Scholar]
  6. Acquier A., Aggeri F. (2007). “Designing an industry: issues and theoretical frame. The case of the CSR reporting industry”, Managing Corporate Social Responsibility in Action: Talking, Doing and Measuring, den Hond F., de Bakker F., Neergaard P. (ed), Ashgate Publishing Group (a paraitre). [Google Scholar]
  7. Acquier A., Gond J.-P. (2005). « Aux sources de la Responsabilite Sociale de l’Entreprise : (re)lecture et analyse d’un ouvrage seminal : Social Responsibilities of the Businessman d’Howard Bowen (1953) », Communication a la conference de l’AIMS, Angers, juin. [Google Scholar]
  8. Acquier A., Gond J.-P. (2006b). « Repenser les theories quand les pratiques les transforment : les enjeux de la marchandisation de la Responsabilite Sociale de l’Entreprise », Revue gestion, vol. 31, n° 2. [Google Scholar]
  9. Aggeri F., Acquier A. (2005). « La theorie des stakeholders permet-elle de rendre compte des pratiques d’entreprise en matiere de developpement durable ? », Communication a la conference de l’AIMS, Angers, juin. [Google Scholar]
  10. Aggeri F., Pezet E., Abrassart C., Acquier A. (2005). Organiser le developpement durable, Paris, Vuibert. [Google Scholar]
  11. Allouche J., Laroche P. (2005). “A meta-analytical examination of the link between corporate social and financial performance”, Paper presented at the Academy of Management, Honolulu, Hawaii. [Google Scholar]
  12. Andriof J., Waddock S., Husted B., Rahman S.S. (2002). Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking, vol. 1: Theory, Responsibility and Engagement, Sheffield, UK, Greenleaf Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  13. Andriof J., Waddock S., Husted B., Sutherland Rahman S. (2003). Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking, vol. 2: Relationships, Communication, Reporting and Performance, Sheffield, UK, Greenleaf Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ansoff I. (1965). Corporate Strategy, New York, McGraw Hill. [Google Scholar]
  15. Barney Jay B. (1991). “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, vol. 17, n° 1, p. 99–120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bauer R.A., Fenn D.H. (1972). The corporate Social Audit, New York, Russel Sage Foundation. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bonnafous-Boucher M., Pesqueux Y. (Ed) (2006). Decider avec les parties prenantes. Approche d’une nouvelle theorie de la societe civile, Editions de La Decouverte. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bowen H.R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the businessman, New York, Harper & Brothers. [Google Scholar]
  19. Burrell G., Morgan G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis, Londres, Heinemann. [Google Scholar]
  20. Calkins R.D. (1946). “Objectives of Business Education”, Harvard Business Review, October, p. 46–54. [Google Scholar]
  21. Callon M., Lascoumes P., Barthes Y. (2001). Agir dans un monde incertain : Essai sur la democratie technique, Paris, Le Seuil. [Google Scholar]
  22. Capron M., Quairel-Lanoizelee F. (2004). Mythes et realites de l’entreprise responsable. Acteurs, enjeux, strategies, Paris, La Decouverte. [Google Scholar]
  23. Carroll A.B. (1979). “A Three Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 4, n° 4, p. 497–505. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Carroll A.B. (1991). “The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Managemen of Organizational Stakeholders”, Business Horizons, July-August, p. 39–48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Carroll A.B. (1999). “Corporate social responsibility. Evolution of a definitional construct”, Business & Society, 38, p. 268–295. [Google Scholar]
  26. Carson R. (1962). Silent Spring, Boston, Houghton Mifflin. [Google Scholar]
  27. Charan R., Freeman R.E. (1979). “Stakeholders negociations: Building bridges with corporate constituents”, Management Review, November, p. 8–13. [Google Scholar]
  28. Clark J.M. (1916). “The Changing Basis of Economic Responsibility”, The Journal of Political Economy, vol. 24, n° 3, p. 209–229. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Clark J.M. (1939). Social Control of Business, 2nd ed., New-York, McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  30. Clarkson M.B.E. (1995). “A stakeholder framework for analysing and evaluating Corporate Social Performance”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, n° 1, p. 92–117. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Cochran P.L., Wood D.J. (1985). “Corporate social responsibility and financial performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 27. [Google Scholar]
  32. Davis K. (1960). “Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities?”, California Management Review, vol. 2, n° 3. [Google Scholar]
  33. Davis K. (1973). “The Case for and Against Business Assumptions of Social Responsibilities”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 16, n° 2, p. 312–322. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Dejean F. (2005). L’investissement socialement responsable. Etude du cas frangais, Vuibert. [Google Scholar]
  35. Dejean F., Gond J.-P et Leca B. (2004). “Measuring the unmeasured: an institutional entrepreneur strategy in an emerging industry”, Human Relations, vol. 57, n° 6, p. 741–764. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Dierkes M., Bauer R.A. (1974). Corporate Social Accounting, New York, Praeger Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  37. Dierkes M., Berthoin Antal A. (1986). “Whither corporate social reporting : Is it time to legislate?”, California Management Review, vol. 28, n° 3. [Google Scholar]
  38. Donaldson T., Preston L.E. (1995). “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation : Concepts, Evidence, and Implications”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 1, n° 20, p. 65–91. [Google Scholar]
  39. Donham W.B. (1927). “The Emerging Profession of Business”, Harvard Business Review, vol. 5, n° 4. [Google Scholar]
  40. Drucker P.F. (1954). The practice of management, Paris (version française 1957), Editions d’Organisation. [Google Scholar]
  41. Elkington J. (1998). Cannibals With Forks. The tripple bottom line of the 21st century business, Oxford, Capstone publishing. [Google Scholar]
  42. Emshoff J.R., Freeman R.E. (1978). “Stakeholder Management”, Working paper, Wharton Applied Research Center. [Google Scholar]
  43. Epstein E.M. (2002). “The Field of Business Ethics in the United States: Past, Present and Future”, Journal of General Management, vol. 28, n° 2, p. 1–29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Frederick W.C. (1994). “Coda”, Business and Society, vol. 33, n° 2. [Google Scholar]
  45. Freeman R.E., Reed D.L. (1983). “Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance”, California Management Review, vol. 25, n° 3, p. 88–107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Freeman R.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach, Marshfield, Massachussets, Pitman Publishing, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  47. Freeman R.E., Evan W.M. (1990). “Corporate Governance: A stakeholder interpretation”, Journal of Behavioral Economics, vol. 19, n° 4. [Google Scholar]
  48. Freeman R.E. (1994). “The politics of stakeholder theory: some future directions”, Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 4, n° 4, p. 409–422. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Freeman, R.E. (1999). “Divergent Stakeholder Theory”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 24, n° 2, p. 233–236. [Google Scholar]
  50. Friedman M. (1962). Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago University Press. [Google Scholar]
  51. Frooman J. (1999). “Stakeholder Influence Strategies”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 24, n° 2, p. 191–205. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Garriga E., Mele D. (2004). “Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 53, n° 2, p. 51–71 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Galbraith J. K. (1969). Le nouvel etat industriel, Gallimard. [Google Scholar]
  54. Gendron C., Lapointe A. et Turcotte M.-F. (2004). « Responsabilite sociale et regulation de l’entreprise mondialisee », Relations industrielles/industrial relations, vol. 59, n° 1, p. 71–100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Hatchuel A. (2000). « Quel horizon pour les sciences de gestion ? Vers une theorie de l’action collective », Les nouvelles fondations des sciences de gestion, elements d’epistemologie en management, David A., Hatchuel A. and Laufer R. (Eds). Paris, Vuibert. [Google Scholar]
  56. Hatchuel A., Pezet E., Starkey K. et Lenay O. (Eds) (2005). Gouvernement, organisation et gestion : l’heritage de Michel Foucault, Presses Universitaires de Laval. [Google Scholar]
  57. Heald M. (1961). “Business Thought in the Twenties: Social Responsibility”, American Quarterly, vol. 13, n° 2, p. 126–139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Heald M. (1970). The Social Responsibilities of Business: Company and Community, 1900-1960, Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University Press. [Google Scholar]
  59. Jarniou P. (1981). L’entreprise comme systeme politique, Paris, PUF. [Google Scholar]
  60. Jawahar I.M., Mclaughlin G.L. (2001). “Toward a descriptive stakeholder theor: an organizational life cycle approach”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 26, n° 3, July. [Google Scholar]
  61. Jensen M.C., Meckling W.H. (1976). “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 3, n° 4, p. 305–360. [Google Scholar]
  62. Jones T.M. (1980). “Corporate Social Responsibility Revisited, Redefined”, California Management Review, XXII (2). [Google Scholar]
  63. Jones T.M. (1995). “Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, n° 2, p. 404–437. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  64. Laufer R. (1996). « Quand diriger, c’est legitimer », Revue française de gestion, novembre-decembre. [Google Scholar]
  65. Malott D.W., (1924). “Business Advancing as a Profession”, Iron Trade Review, June 12, p. 1564–1565. [Google Scholar]
  66. Management Review (1980). “How AT&T copes with its stakeholders”, vol. 69, n° 8, p. 4–8. [Google Scholar]
  67. Margolis J.D., Walsh J.P. (2003). “Misery Loves Companies : Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business”, Administrative Science Quarterly. [Google Scholar]
  68. Martinet A.-C. (1984). Management strategique : organisation et politique, Mc Graw Hill. [Google Scholar]
  69. Martinet A.-C., Reynaud E., Management strategique et ecologie, Economica, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  70. Mitchell R.K., Agle B.R., Wood D.J. (1997). “Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 22, n° 4, p. 853–886. [Google Scholar]
  71. Mitchell R.K., Agle B.R., Sonnenfield J.A. (1999). “Who matter to CEO? An investigation of Stakeholders Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance, and CEO values”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 42, n° 5. [Google Scholar]
  72. Moon J., Crane A., Matten D. (2005). “Can Corporations Be Citizens? Corporate Citizenship as a Metaphor for Business Participation in Society”, Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 15, n° 3, p. 429–453. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  73. Moskotitz M.R. (1972). “Choosing Socially Responsible Stocks”, Business and Society Review, n° 1, p. 72–75. [Google Scholar]
  74. Nader R. (1965). Unsafe at Any Speed, Pocket Books. [Google Scholar]
  75. Norman W., MacDonald C. (2004). “Getting to the bottom line of the tripple bottom line”, Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 14, n° 2, p. 243–263. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  76. Orlitzky M., Schmidt F.L. et Rynes S.L. (2003). “Corporate social and financial performance :A meta-analysis”, Organization Studies, vol. 24, n° 3, p. 103–141. [Google Scholar]
  77. Pasquero J. (1980). « L’entreprise face aux pressions socio-politiques de son environne- ment », document de travail n° 80-100, IAE-IEC Grenoble, juin. [Google Scholar]
  78. Pasquero J. (2005). « La responsabilite sociale de l’entreprise comme objet des sciences de gestion : Un regard historique », Responsabilite sociale et environnementale de l’entreprise, Turcotte M.-F. et Salmon A. (Eds.), Presses de l’Universite du Quebec. [Google Scholar]
  79. Pfeffer J., Salancik G.R. (1978). The external control of organizations: a ressource dependanceperspective, Harper et Row Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  80. Phillips R. (2003). Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics, San Francisco, Berrett-Koehler. [Google Scholar]
  81. Phillips R., Freeman R.E., Wicks A.C. (2003). “What Stakeholder Theory Is Not”, Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 13, n° 4, p. 479–502. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  82. Post J., Preston L.E. et Sauter-Sachs S. (2003). Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth, Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  83. Prahalad C.K., Hart S.L. (2002). “The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid”, Strategy and Business, 26, p. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  84. Rowley T.J. (1997). “Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 22, n° 4, p. 887–910. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  85. Rowley T.J., Moldoveanu M. (2003). “When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 28, n° 2, p. 204–219. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  86. Scholte A. (2001). “Globalization, governance and Corporate Citizenship”, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 1, p. 15–23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  87. Sturdivant F.D. (1979). “Executives and Activists: Test of stakeholder Management”, California Management Review, XXII (1). [Google Scholar]
  88. Swanson D.L. (1995). “Adressing a theoretical problem by reorienting the corporate social performance model”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, n° 1, p. 43–64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  89. Swanson D.L. (1991). “Toward an integrative theory of business and society : a research strategy for corporate social performance”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 24, n° 3, p. 506–521. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  90. Teece D.J., Pisano G. et al. (1997). “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, p. 509–533. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  91. Trevino L.K., Weaver G. (1999). “The Stakeholder Research Tradition: Converging Theorists - Not Converging Theory”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 24, n° 2, p. 222–227. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  92. Vogel D. (1986). “The Study of Social Issues in Management: A Critical Appraisal”, California Management Review, XXVIII 2, Winter. [Google Scholar]
  93. Vogel D. (2005). The Market for Virtue - The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility, Washington, Brookings Institution Press. [Google Scholar]
  94. Waddock S., Graves S.B. (1997a). “Quality of Management and Quality of Stakeholders Relations: Are they Synonymous?”, Business & Society, 105, p. 47–62. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  95. Waddock S., Graves S.B. (1997b). “The Corporate Social Performance - Financial Performance Link”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, n° 4, p. 313–319. [Google Scholar]
  96. Walsh J.P. (2005). “Book Review Essay: Taking Stock of Stakeholder Management”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 30, n° 2, p. 426–438. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  97. Wartick S.L., Cochran P.L. (1985). “The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 10, n° 4. [Google Scholar]
  98. Wartick S.L., Rude R.E. (1986). “Issues Management: Corporate Fad or Corporate Function?”, California Management Review, XXIX 1, Fall. [Google Scholar]
  99. WBCSD (2002). The Business Case for Sustainable Development, Switzerland, WBCSD. [Google Scholar]
  100. Weaver G., Trevino L.K., Cochran P.L. (1999). “Integrated and Decoupled Corporate Social Performance: Management Commitments, External Pressures, and Corporate Ethics Practices”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 42, n° 5, p. 539–552. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  101. Wood DJ. (1991a). “Social Issues in Management : Theory and Research in Corporate Social Performance”, Journal of Management, vol. 17 n° 2, p. 383–406. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  102. Wood D.J. (1991b). “Corporate Social Performance Revisited”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 16, n° 4. [Google Scholar]
  103. Wood D.J. (2000). “Theory and Integrity in Business and Society”, Business & Society, vol. 39, n° 4, p. 359–378. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  104. Zadek S. (2004). “The Path to Corporate Responsibility”, Harvard Business Review, decembre. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.