Authentification abonné
lvrfg
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 42 / Numéro 255 (Mars 2016) Rev. Fr. Gest., 42 255 (2016) 105-119 Références
Accès gratuit
Numéro
Rev. Fr. Gest.
Volume 42, Numéro 255, Mars 2016
Processus stratégiques innovants
Page(s) 105 - 119
DOI https://doi.org/10.3166/rfg.2016.00024
Publié en ligne 13 mai 2016
  1. Agarwal N. et Brem A. (2012), “Frugal and reverse innovation literature overview and case study insights from a German MNC in India and China”, Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on engineering, technology and innovation, IEEE Xplore, Munich. [Google Scholar]
  2. Anand M. et Monin P. ( 2013). “Innovation processes in emerging markets: empirical evidence from the Indian insurance industry”, Management International vol. 18, no 1, p. 40– 57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson J. et Billou N. ( 2007). “Serving the world's poor: innovation at the base of the economic pyramid”, Journal of Business Strategy vol. 28, no 2, p. 14– 21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ben Mahmoud-Jouini S. et Silberzahn P. ( 2016). « Clayton Christensen : les innovations de rupture : défis et principes de management », Les grands auteurs en management de l’innovation et de la créativité , Burger-Helmchen T., Hussler C., Cohendet P. (Eds), EMS, p. 283– 296. [Google Scholar]
  5. Birkinshaw J. et Fry J. ( 1998). “Fighting the corporate immune system: Initiative strategies for subsidiary managers”, Sloan Management Review vol. 39, p. 51– 62. [Google Scholar]
  6. Brem A. et Wolfram P. ( 2014). “Research and development from the bottom-up: introduction of terminologies for new product development in emerging markets”, Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship vol. 3, no 9, p. 1– 22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Burger-Helmchen T., Cohendet P. et Radojevic N. ( 2013). « L’innovation inverse : un retournement du principe de diffusion internationale des innovations ? », L’engagement international à l’écoute du local , Mayrhofer U., Véry P., Gualino (Éds), p. 131– 149. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cantwell J. et Mudambi R. ( 2005). “MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates”, Strategic Management Journal vol. 26, p. 1109– 1128. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Christensen C.M. ( 1997). The Innovator's Dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail , Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. [Google Scholar]
  10. Christensen C.M. et Raynor M.E. ( 2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth , Harvard Business School Press. [Google Scholar]
  11. Christensen C.M. et Rosenbloom R. ( 1995). “Explaining the attacker's advantage: technological paradigms, organisational dynamics and the value network”, Research Policy vol. 24, p. 233– 257. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Corsi S. et Di Minin A. ( 2014). “Disruptive Innovation… in Reverse: Adding a Geographical Dimension to Disruptive Innovation Theory”, Creativity And Innovation Management vol. 23, p. 76– 90. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Danneels E. ( 2004). “Disruptive technology reconsidered: a critique and research agenda”, Journal of Product Innovation Management vol. 21, no 4, p. 246– 258. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Doz Y.L. et Prahalad C.K. ( 1991). “Managing DMNCs: A search for a new paradigm”, Strategic Management Journal vol. 12, p. 145– 164. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Govindarajan V. et Kopalle P. ( 2006). “Disruptiveness of Innovations: measurement and an assessment of reliability and validity”, Strategic Management Journal vol. 27, no 2, p. 189– 199. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Govindarajan V. et Ramamurti R. ( 2011). “Reverse Innovation, emerging markets, and global strategy”, Global Strategy Journal vol. 1, no 3–4, p. 191– 205. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Govindarajan V., Kopalle P. et Danneels E. ( 2011). “The effects of mainstream and emerging customer orientations on radical and disruptive innovations”, Journal of Product Innovation Management vol. 28, no 2, p. 121– 132. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Guérineau M., Ben Mahmoud-Jouini S. et Charue-Duboc F. ( 2015). « Différencier les contributions des filiales d’une multinationale en matière d’innovation », Management international vol. 19, no 4, p. 34– 48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gupta A.K. et Govindarajan V. ( 1991). “Knowledge Flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations”, Academy of Management Review vol. 13, p. 768– 792. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hang C.-C., Chen J. et Subramanian A. M. ( 2010). “Developing disruptive products for emerging economies: lessons from Asian cases”, Research-Technology Management vol. 53, no 4, p. 21– 26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Harzing A.W. et Noorderhaven N.G. ( 2006). “Knowledge flows in MNCs: An empirical test and extension of Gupta & Govindarajan's typology of subsidiary roles”, International Business Review vol. 15, no 3, p. 195– 214. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Immelt J.R., Govindarajan V. et Trimble C. ( 2009). “How GE is Disrupting Itself”, Harvard Business Review vol. 87, no 10, p. 56– 65. [Google Scholar]
  23. Judge B., Hölttä-Otto K. et Winter A. (2015). “Developing world users as lead users: a case study in engineering reverse innovation”, MIT Working paper. [Google Scholar]
  24. Jullien B., Lung Y. et Midler C. ( 2012). L’épopée Logan , Dunod. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kenney M., Massini S. et Murtha T.P. ( 2009). “Offshoring administrative and technical work: new fields for understanding the global enterprise”, Journal of International Business Studies vol. 40, p. 887– 900. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Laperche B. et Lefebvre G. ( 2012). “The globalization of Research & Development in industrial corporations: Towards ‘reverse innovation?”, Journal of Innovation Economics and Management vol. 2, p. 53– 79. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lemminger R., Zijdemans E., Rasmunssen E., Tanev S. et Svendsen L. ( 2015). “Lean and global technological start-ups: linking th two streams of literature”, International Journal of Innovation Management vol. 19, no 3, p. 1– 41. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mas I. et Radcliffe D. ( 2010). “Mobile payments go viral: M-PESA in Kenya”, Yes Africa can: Success stories from a dynamic continent , P. Chuhan - Pole, M. Angwafo (Eds), World Bank Publications, p. 353– 370. [Google Scholar]
  29. Meyer K.E., Mudambi R. et Narula R. ( 2011). “Multinational Enterprises and local contexts: the opportunities and challenges of multiple embeddedness”, Journal of Management Studies vol. 48, p. 235– 252. [Google Scholar]
  30. Mudambi R., Piscitello L. et Rabbiosi L. ( 2014). “Reverse knowledge transfer in MNEs: subsidiary innovativeness and entry modes”, Long Range Planning vol. 47, p. 49– 67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Nakata C. et Weidner K. ( 2011). “Enhancing new product adoption at the base of the pyramid: a contextualized model”, Journal of Product Innovation Management vol. 2, no 1, p. 6– 12. [Google Scholar]
  32. Prahalad C. et Mashelkar R.A. ( 2010). “Innovation's Holy Grail”, Harvard Business Review July–August, p. 2– 10. [Google Scholar]
  33. Prahalad C., ( 2004). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: eradicating poverty through profits , Wharton Scholl Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  34. Radjou N., Prabhu J., Ahuja S. et Roberts K. ( 2012). Jugaad Innovation: Think Frugal, Be Flexible, Generate Breakthrough Growth , Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  35. Radojevic N. ( 2015). “Much geo-economic ado about primary market shift: reverse innovation re-conceptualised”, Management International vol. 19, no 4, p. 79– 82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Reilly M., Scott P. et Mangematin V. ( 2012). “Alignment or independence? Multinational subsidiaries and parent relations”, Journal of Business Strategy vol. 33, no 2, p. 4– 11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Schumpeter J. ( 1934). The theory of economic development , Mass: Harvard University Press, Cambridge. [Google Scholar]
  38. Schmidt G. et Druehl C. ( 2008). “When is disruptive innovation disruptive?”, Journal of Product Innovation Management vol. 25, p. 347– 369. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Seghal V., Dehoff K. et Panneer G. ( 2010). “The importance of frugal engineering”, Strategy + Business vol. 59 [Google Scholar]
  40. Subramaniam M., Ernst H. et Dubiel A. ( 2015). “From the special issue editors: innovations for and from emerging markets”, Journal of Product Innovation Management vol. 32, no 1, p. 5– 11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Tiwari R. et Herstatt C. ( 2012). “India. A lead market for frugal innovations? Extending the Lead market theory to emerging economies”, Hamburg University of Technology, Technology and Innovation Management Working Paper, no 67. [Google Scholar]
  42. Vernon R. ( 1966). “International Investment and international trade in the product life cycle”, Quarterly Journal of Economics vol. 80, no 2, p. 190– 207. [Google Scholar]
  43. Villon de Benveniste G. ( 2013). “Innovation de rupture: concept fondamental ou slogan creux?”, Entreprendre et innover vol. 18, no 2, p. 7– 13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. von Zedtwitz M., Corsi S., Søberg P. et Frega R. ( 2015). “A Typology of Reverse Innovation”, Journal of Product Innovation Management vol. 32, p. 1– 12. [Google Scholar]
  45. Yang Q., Mudambi R. et Meyer K.E. ( 2008). “Conventional and reverse knowledge flows in multinational Corporations”, Journal of Management vol. 34, no 5, p. 882– 902. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Yu D. et Hang C. ( 2010). “A reflective review of disruptive innovation theory”, International Journal of Management Review vol. 12, p. 435– 452. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Zeng M. et Williamson P.J. ( 2007). Dragons at your door: how Chinese cost innovation is disrupting the rules of global competition , Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. [Google Scholar]
  48. Zeschky M., Widenmayer B. et Gassmann O. ( 2011). “Frugal innovation in emerging markets”, Research-Technology Management vol. 54, no 4, p. 38– 45. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zijdemans E. et Tanev S. ( 2014). “Conceptualizing innovation in born-global firms”, Technology Innovation Management Review vol. 4, no 9, p. 5– 10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.