Authentification abonné
lvrfg
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 42 / Numéro 259 (Août-sept 2016) Rev. Fr. Gest., 42 259 (2016) 121-138 Références
Accès gratuit
Numéro
Rev. Fr. Gest.
Volume 42, Numéro 259, Août-sept 2016
Coopérations et réseaux
Page(s) 121 - 138
Section Dossier
DOI https://doi.org/10.3166/rfg.2016.00068
Publié en ligne 27 octobre 2016
  1. Ahuja G. (2000). “Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 45, no 3, p. 425‐455. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allatta J.T. et Singh H. (2011). “Evolving communication patterns in response to an acquisition event”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 32, no 10, p. 1099‐1118. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Angwin D. et Vaara E. (2005). “Connectivity in merging organizations: Beyond traditional cultural perspectives”, Organization Studies, vol. 26, no 10, p. 1445‐ 1453. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Birkinshaw J., Bresman H. et Håkanson L. (2000). “Managing the post-acquisition integration process: How the human integration and task integration processes interact to foster value creation”. Journal of Management Studies, vol. 37, no 3, p. 395‐425. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bresman H., Birkinshaw J. et Nobel R. (1999). “Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions”, Journal of International Business Studies, p. 439‐462. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Borgatti S.P. et Cross R. (2003). “A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks”, Management Science, vol. 49, no 4 p. 432‐445. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bouty I (2000). “Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R&D researchers across organizational boundaries”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 43, no 1, p. 50‐65. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Briscoe F. et Tsai W. (2011). “Overcoming relational inertia: how organizational members respond to acquisition events in a law firm”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 56, no 3 p. 408‐440. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Buono A. et Bowditch J. (2003). Human side of mergers and acquisitions: Managing collisions between people and organisations, Edit. Beard Books, Washington DC. [Google Scholar]
  10. Burt R.S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition, Harvard Univ. Press. [Google Scholar]
  11. Dekker D., Krackhardt D. et Snijders T.A. (2007). “Sensitivity of MRQAP tests to collinearity and autocorrelation conditions”, Psychometrika, vol. 72, no 4, p. 563‐581. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Degenne A. et Forsé M. (2004). Les réseaux sociaux, Éd. Armand Collin, coll. “U”, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gulati R. et Gargiulo M. (1999). “Where do interorganizational networks come from?”, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 104, no 5, p. 1439‐1493. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Granovetter M. (1973). “The strength of weak ties”, American Journal of Sociology, 78, p. 1360‐1380. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gulati R., Puranam P. et Tushman M. (2012). “Meta-organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 33, no 6, p. 571‐586. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hansen M.T. (1999). “The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 44, no 1, p. 82‐111. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Haspeslagh P. et Jemison D.B. (1991). Managing acquisitions: creating value through corporate renewal, The Free Press, New York [Google Scholar]
  18. Hite J. M. (2005). “Evolutionary processes and paths of relationally embedded network ties in emerging entrepreneurial firms”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 29, no 1, p. 113‐144. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kang S.C., Morris S.S. et Snell S.A. (2007). “Relational archetypes, organizational learning, and value creation: Extending the human resource architecture”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 32, n° 1, p. 236‐256. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Koenig G. (1996). « Karl. E. Weick », Revue française de gestion, no 108, mars-mai, p. 57-70. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kœnig G. et Meier O. (2001). « Acquisitions de symbiose : les inconvénients d’une approche rationaliste », M@n@gement, vol. 4, no 1, p. 23‐45. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Krackhardt D. (1988). “Predicting with networks: Nonparametric multiple regression analysis of dyadic data”, Social networks, vol. 10, no 4, p. 359‐381. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Larsson R. et Finkelstein L. (1999). “Integrating strategic, organizational and human resource perspectives on mergers and acquisitions: a case of synergy realization”, Organization Science, 10, p. 1‐26. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lazega E. (2001). The collegial phenomenon-The social mechanisms of cooperation among peers in a corporate law partnership, Oxford University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lazega E. (2014). Réseaux sociaux et structures relationnelles, PUF, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  26. Marion T.J., Eddleston K.A., Friar J.H. et Deeds D. (2015). “The evolution of interorganizational relationships in emerging ventures: An ethnographic study within the new product development process”, Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 30, n° 1, p. 167‐184. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Meyer K.E. et Lieb-Dóczy E. (2003). “Post-acquisition restructuring as evolutionary process”, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 40, no 2, p. 459‐482. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ring P.S. et Van de Ven A.H. (1994). “Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 19, no 1, p. 90‐118. [Google Scholar]
  29. Rouzies A. (2011). “Antecedents of employees’ identification with a merger: A three-stage empirical study”, International Studies of Management & Organization, vol. 41, no 3, p. 25‐41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Schutjens V. et Stam E. (2003). “The evolution and nature of young firm networks: A longitudinal perspective”, Small Business Economics, vol. 21, no 2, p. 115‐134. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Scott J. (2000). Social Network Analysis, Sage Publications, Londres. [Google Scholar]
  32. Shaver J.M. (2006). “A paradox of synergy: contagion and capacity effects in mergers and acquisitions”, Academy of Management Review, 31, p. 962‐976. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sosa M.E., Gargiulo M. et Rowles C. (2015). “Can informal communication networks disrupt coordination in new product development projects?”, Organization Science, vol. 26, n° 4, p. 1059‐1078. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Stahl G.K. et Sitkin S.B. (2005). “Trust in mergers and acquisitions”, Mergers and acquisitions: Managing culture and human resources, p. 82‐102. [Google Scholar]
  35. Stahl G.K. et Voigt A. (2008). “Do cultural differences matter in mergers and acquisitions? A tentative model and examination”, Organization Science, 19, p. 160‐176. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Teerikangas S. (2012). “Dynamics of acquired firm pre-acquisition employee reactions”, Journal of Management, vol. 38, no 2, p. 599‐639. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Teerikangas S. et Irrmann O. (2016). “Cultural change following international acquisitions: cohabiting the tension between espoused and practiced cultures”, Management International Review, vol. 56, no 2, p. 195‐226. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Tsai W. (2002). “Social structure of ”coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing”, Organization Science, vol. 13, no 2, p. 179‐190. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Uzzi B. (1997). “Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness”, Administrative Science Quarterly, p. 35‐67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. White H. (1992). Identity and Control: A Structural Theory of Social Action, Princeton University Press [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.