- Aldebert B., Meier O. et Missonier A. (2010). « Dynamique culturelle dans le cas d’une fusion Et si faire évoluer sa culture était possible ? », Revue française de gestion, vol. 36, no 206, août-septembre, p. 65‐83. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Alvesson M. (1993). “Organizations as rhetoric : knowledge-intensive firms and the struggle with ambiguity”, Journal of Management studies, vol. 30, no 6, novembre, p. 996‐1013. [Google Scholar]
- Barrier J. (2015). « Fusionner les Universités pour revitaliser la Lorraine ? », Les Annales de la Recherche Urbaine, no 109, décembre, p. 44‐59. [Google Scholar]
- Barney J.B. (1986). “Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck and business strategy”, Management Science, vol. 32, no 10, octobre, p. 1231‐1241. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Barney J.B. (1991). “Firm Resources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of Management, vol. 17, no 1, p. 99‐120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Basu K. (2006). “Merging brands after mergers”, California Management Review, vol. 48, no 4, p. 28‐40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Boling J.R, Mayo D.T. et Helms M.M. (2017). “Complementarity merger as a driver of change and growth in higher education”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, vol. 30, no 1, p. 27‐42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Brehm J.W. (1972). Responses to Loss of Freedom: A Theory of Psychological Reactance, General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ. [Google Scholar]
- Buono A.F. et Bowditch J.L. (1989). The Human Side of Mergers and Acquisitions: Managing Collisions Between People, Cultures and Organisations, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco. [Google Scholar]
- Capron L. et Hulland J. (1999). “Redeployment of brands, sales forces, and general marketing management expertise following horizontal acquisitions: A resource-based view”, Journal of Marketing, vol. 63, no 2, avril, p. 41‐54. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Conner K.R. (1991). “A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: Do we have a new theory of the firm?”, Journal of Management, vol. 17, no 1, p. 121‐154. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Czarniawska B. (2015). “Part 1 - Past present and future: University fashions: on ideas whose time has come”, Universities in the Flux of Time: An Exploration of time and Temporality in University Life, Gibbs P., Ylijoki O.-H., Guzman-Valenzuela C. et Barnett R. (Ed.), Chapitre 2, Routledge Publishing/Taylor and Francis Group: Abingdon, p. 32-45. [Google Scholar]
- Derbaix A. (2005). M&A Operations, Concentration Variations and Industries Linkages. An Extended Analysis of the Market Power Hypothesis, Thèse de doctorat, Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgique. [Google Scholar]
- Derbaix C. et Poncin I. (2005). « La mesure des réactions affectives en marketing : évaluation des principaux outils », Recherche et Applications en Marketing, vol. 20, no 2, p. 55‐76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ettenson R. et Knowles J. (2006). “Merging the brands and branding the merger”, MIT Sloan Management Review, vol. 47, no 4, juin, p. 39‐49. [Google Scholar]
- Faccio M. et Masulis R.W. (2005). “The choice of payment method in European mergers and acquisitions”, The Journal of Finance, vol. 60, no 3, p. 1345‐1388. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ferreira M.P., Santos J.C., de Almeida M.I.R. et Reis N.R. (2014). “Mergers & Acquisitions research: A bibliometric study of top strategy and international business journals, 1980-2010”, Journal of Business Research, vol. 67, no 12, décembre, p. 2550‐2558. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Fielden J. et Markham L. (1997). “Learning lessons from mergers in higher education”, Commonwealth Higher Education Management Service, Londres. [Google Scholar]
- Graebner M.E. (2004). “Momentum and serendipity: How acquired leaders create value in the integration of technology firms”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 25, no 8-9, p. 751‐777. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Graebner M.E., Heimeriks K.H, Huy Q.N. et Vaara E. (2017). “The process of postmerger integration: A review and agenda for future research”, Academy of Management Annals, vol. 11, no 1, p. 1‐32. [Google Scholar]
- Grantham R. (2015). “Corporate combos offer lessons for merging colleges”, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, février, disponible sur : http://m.ajc.com/news/business/corporate-combos-offerlessonsfor-merging-college/nj4r2/. [Google Scholar]
- Haspeslagh P.C. et Jemison D.B. (1991). Managing acquisitions, Free Press, New York. [Google Scholar]
- Homburg C. et Bucerius M. (2005). “A marketing perspective on mergers and acquisitions: How marketing integration affects post-merger performance”, Journal of Marketing, vol. 69, no 1, janvier, p. 95‐113. [Google Scholar]
- Hunt S.D. et Morgan R.M. (1995). “The comparative advantage theory of competition”, Journal of Marketing, vol. 59, avril, p. 1‐15 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Huy Q.N. et Reus T. (2011). “An emotion-based view of acquisition integration capability”, dans Academy of Management 2011 Annual Meeting - West Meets East: Enlightening. Balancing. Transcending, AOM. [Google Scholar]
- Jaju A., Joiner C. et Reddy S.K. (2006). “Consumer evaluations of corporate brand redeployments”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 34, no 2, p. 206‐215. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson G., Scholes K. et Whittington R. (2011). Exploring Strategy, Pearson Education Ltd. [Google Scholar]
- Kapferer J.-N. (2008). The New Strategic Brand Management: Creating and Sustaining Brand Equity Long Term, Kogan Page Publishers, Londres. [Google Scholar]
- Machado J.C., Vacas de Carvalho L., Costa P. et Lencastre P. (2012). “Brand mergers: examining consumers’ responses to name and logo design”, Journal of Product & Brand Management, vol. 21, no 6, p. 418‐427. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- McLelland M.A., Goldsmith R. et McMahon D. (2014). “Customers reactions to the merger: Understanding the role of pre-merger brands”, Journal of Brand Management, vol. 21, no 7-8, p. 615‐634. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Marks M.L. et Mirvis P.H. (1985). Merger syndrome: Stress and uncertainty, Mergers and Acquisitions, vol. 20, p. 50‐55. [Google Scholar]
- Marks M.L. et Mirvis P.H. (2010). Joining Forces Making One Plus One Equal Three in Mergers, Acquisitions and Alliances, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. [Google Scholar]
- Marks M.L. et Mirvis P.H. (2011). “Merge ahead: A research agenda to increase merger and acquisition success”, Journal of Business Psychology, vol. 26, p. 161‐168. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Marks M.L., Mirvis P.H. et Ashkenas R.A. (2017). “Surviving M&A. How to thrive amid the turmoil”, Harvard Business Review, March-April, p. 145‐149. [Google Scholar]
- Nesterkin D.A. (2013). “Organizational change and psychological reactance”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, vol. 26, no 3, p. 573‐594. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Papavasileiou E.Z. (2015). “Corporate syntheses: Consumers’ role in mergers and acquisitions”, Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 36, p. 1054‐1056. [Google Scholar]
- Petromilli M., Morrison D. et Million M. (2002). “Brand architecture: Building brand portfolio value”, Strategy & Leadership, vol. 3, no 5, p. 228. [Google Scholar]
- Seo M. et Hill N.S. (2005). “Understanding the human side of merger and acquisition: An integrative framework”, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, vol. 41, no 4, p. 422‐443. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Singh H. et Montgomery C. (1987). “Corporate acquisitions strategies and economic performance”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 8, no 4, p. 377‐386 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Thorbjǿrnsen H. et Dahlén M. (2011). “Customer reactions to acquirer-dominant mergers and acquisitions”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, vol. 28, no 4, décembre, p. 332‐341. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Thornton E., Arndt M. et Weber J. (2004). “Why consumers hate mergers”, Business Week, Decembre, p. 58‐63. [Google Scholar]
Accès gratuit
Numéro |
Rev. Fr. Gest.
Volume 43, Numéro 268, octobre 2017
Sciences, techniques et pratiques de gestion
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 97 - 132 | |
Section | Grand-angle | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.3166/rfg.2017.00177 | |
Publié en ligne | 17 janvier 2018 |
Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.
Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.
Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.