Authentification abonné
lvrfg
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 44 / Numéro 272 (avril 2018) Rev. Fr. Gest., 44 272 (2018) 103-120 Références
Accès gratuit
Numéro
Rev. Fr. Gest.
Volume 44, Numéro 272, avril 2018
Management de l’innovation collective
Page(s) 103 - 120
Section Dossier
DOI https://doi.org/10.3166/rfg.2018.00240
Publié en ligne 3 septembre 2018
  1. Barlatier P.-J. (2016). « Management de l’innovation et nouvelle ère numérique », Revue française de gestion, vol. 43, no 254, p. 55‐63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Birkinshaw J., Bessant J. et Delbridge R. (2007). “Finding, forming, and performing: Creating networks for discontinuous innovation”, California Management Review, vol. 49, no 3, p. 67‐84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Birkinshaw J. et Duke L. (2013). “Employee led innovation”, London Business School Review, vol. 24, no 2, p. 46‐51. [Google Scholar]
  4. Brault J. (2013). « Technip ou l’émergence d’un champion national de l’ingénierie pétrolière », Entreprises et histoire, no 71, p. 39‐61. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chesbrough H.W. (2006). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business Press, Cambridge. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cohen W.M. et Levinthal D.A. (2000). “Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation”, Strategic Learning in a Knowledge Economy, Cross R.L. et Israelit S.B. (Eds.), Butterworth-Heinemann, Bostin, p. 39‐67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dalmasso C. et Maniak R. (2015). « La genèse d’un centre de R&D à l’international. Le cas de l’industrie automobile », Management International, vol. 19, no 4. p. 83‐94. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Duncan R. (1976). The Ambidextrous Organization: Designing Dual Structures for Innovation, North-Holland, New York. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ellison N.B., Gibbs J.L. et Weber M.S. (2015). “The use of enterprise social network sites for knowledge sharing in distributed organizations: The role of organizational affordances”, American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 59, no 1, p. 103‐123. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ferrona M., Massa P. et Odella F. (2011). “Analyzing collaborative networks emerging in Enterprise 2.0: The Taolin platform”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 10, p. 68‐78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Garcia R. et Calantone R. (2002). “A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 19, no 2, p. 110‐132. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hooge S., Béjean M. et Arnoux F. (2016). “Organising for radical innovation: The benefits of the interplay between cognitive and organisational processes in KCP workshops”, International Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 20, no 4, p. 205‐237. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Howe J. (2008). Crowdsourcing: How the Power of the Crowd is Driving the Future of Business, Random House, Londres. [Google Scholar]
  14. Howells J. (2006). “Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation”, Research Policy, vol. 35, p. 715‐728. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Huberman A.M., Miles M.B. et De Backer C. (1991). Analyse des données qualitatives : recueil de nouvelles méthodes, De Boeck Université, Bruxelles. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lazonick W. (2010). “Innovative business models and varieties of capitalism: Financialization of the US corporation”, Business History Review, vol. 84, no 4, p. 675‐702. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Leonardi P.M. (2014). “Social media, knowledge sharing, and innovation: Toward a theory of communication visibility”, Information Systems Research, vol. 25, no 4, p. 796‐816. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Li C. (2015). “Why no one uses the corporate social network”, Harvard Business Review, https://hbr.org/2015/04/why-no-one-uses-the-corporate-social-network?autocomplete=true. [Google Scholar]
  19. Mäntymäki M. et Riemer K. (2016). “Enterprise social networking: A knowledge management perspective”, International Journal of Information Management, vol. 36, no 6, p. 1042‐1052. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. March J.G. (1991). “Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning”, Organization Science, vol. 2, no 1, p. 71‐87. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. McAfee A.P. (2009). “Shattering the myths about Enterprise 2.0”, IT Management Select - MIT, http://ebusiness.mit.edu/research/Briefs/mcafee-xiii_may11.pdf [Google Scholar]
  22. Recker J., Malsbender A. et Kohlborn T. (2016). “Learning how to effectively use enterprise social networks as innovation platforms”, IT Professional, vol. 18, no 2, p. 2‐9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Reid S.E. et De Brentani U. (2004). “The fuzzy front end of new product development for discontinuous innovations: A theoretical model”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 21, no 3, p. 170‐184. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Segrestin B. (2005). “Partnering to explore: the Renault-Nissan alliance as a forerunner of new cooperative patterns”, Research Policy, vol. 34, no 5, p. 657‐672. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Treem J.W. et Leonardi P.M. (2012). “Social media use in organizations: exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association”, Communication Yearbook, no 36, p. 143‐189. [Google Scholar]
  26. Von Hippel E. (2001). “Innovation by user communities: Learning from open-source software”, MIT Sloan Management Review, vol. 49, no 4, p. 82‐86. [Google Scholar]
  27. Yin R.K. (1993). Applications of Case Study Research, Sage, Londres [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.